By SEWELL CHAN, New York Times
|  | 
| Wind Power Equipment Aid | 
WASHINGTON  —   The Obama administration  accused China on Wednesday of  illegally subsidizing the production of wind power equipment and called  for discussions at the World Trade Organization, the first step in a trade case  sought by American steelworkers. 
 It is the second time in less than four months that the administration has accused China of violating world trade rules. 
 The move escalates the trade tensions between the United States and  China over clean energy, a sector that the administration views as a  technological frontier in which American companies are struggling to  remain competitive. 
 Washington is challenging a special government fund in China that awards  grants to makers of wind power equipment. The Americans say the fund   provides subsidies that are illegal under W.T.O. rules because the  grants appear to be contingent on manufacturers using parts made in  China rather than foreign-made components. 
 “Import substitution subsidies are particularly harmful and inherently  trade distorting, which is why they are expressly prohibited under  W.T.O. rules,”  Ron Kirk,  the United States trade representative, said. “These subsidies  effectively operate as a barrier to U.S. exports to China. Opening  markets by removing barriers to our exports is a core element of the  president’s trade strategy.” 
 The grants available under the Chinese program range from $6.7 million  to $22.5 million, and the recipients, and the Chinese makers of wind turbines and associated parts can receive multiple awards as the size of the wind turbine models increases. 
 Grants under the program since 2008 could total several hundred million dollars, Mr. Kirk’s office said. 
 The accusation on Wednesday is the first step in the W.T.O. dispute  settlement process. If China and the United States cannot reach a  solution through consultations, the United States may request the  establishment of a W.T.O. dispute settlement panel. 
 The action grows out of an investigation Mr. Kirk’s office initiated on Oct. 15 in response to a complaint by the United Steelworkers  over a range of practices in the clean-energy sector, including  prohibited subsidies, export restraints, discrimination against foreign  companies and imported goods, requirements that foreign companies  transfer technology to their domestic counterparts. 
 The wide-ranging filing, known as a Section 301 complaint, has been the  subject of several one-on-one talks between Chinese and American trade  officials. 
 Mr. Kirk’s office said it  “was able to make progress on some of these  other areas of concern during the course of the Section 301  investigation through its bilateral engagement with China.” 
 China agreed to lift one barrier to foreign developers seeking to build  wind farms there after two days of meetings last week in Washington,  part of an annual forum known as the United States-China Joint  Commission on Commerce and Trade. Beijing will allow overseas experience  in wind farm development, and not just experience in China, to qualify  them for Chinese projects. 
 But several other barriers remain: foreign developers are barred from  offshore projects for national reasons, are not allowed to borrow as  much money as domestic developers and are not allowed to sell carbon  credits from their wind farms. 
 Mr. Kirk said his office would continue to investigate the  steelworker  complaints that have not already been addressed   but was not planning  additional formal action under Section 301, which is part of the Trade  Act of 1974 and authorized the president to take “all appropriate  action,” including retaliation, to remove practices by foreign  governments that violate international trade agreements or discriminates  against American commerce. 
 “We will continue to work closely with the U.S.W. and other stakeholders  in the months ahead on the remaining allegations,” Mr. Kirk said.  referring to the steelworkers union. “If we are able to develop  sufficient evidence to support those allegations and they can be  effectively addressed through W.T.O. litigation, we will pursue the  enforcement of our rights at the W.T.O. independently of Section 301.” 
 The steelworkers union, in a statement, said that resolving the  remaining issues would take considerable effort. “The goal is not  litigation; it’s to end their practices,” the union said. 
 The new decision follows  two earlier cases the Obama administration brought against China on Sept. 15. 
 In one case, the United States is asserting that China violated W.T.O. procedures  when it imposed duties on imports of a specialty steel producer, known  as grain-oriented flat-rolled electrical steel, from the United States. 
 In the other case, the United States is challenging China’s restrictions on foreign suppliers of electronic payment services, including major American credit card companies like MasterCard and Visa.        
 Those cases are continuing. 
 “Our decision today, along with the two other W.T.O. cases that we  recently filed against China, underscores our commitment to ensuring a  level playing field with China for American workers and businesses,” Mr.  Kirk said in a statement.        









0 Comments:
Post a Comment