New report finds that yes religion is the source of most of today's terrorism.


Courtesy of the Guardian: 

Religious extremism has become the main driver of terrorism in recent years, according to this year’s Global Terrorism Index. 

The report recorded 18,000 deaths in 2013, a rise of 60% on the previous year. The majority (66%) of these were attributable to just four groups: Islamic State (Isis) in Iraq and Syria, Boko Haram in Nigeria, the Taliban in Afghanistan and al-Qaida. 

Overall there has been a fivefold increase in deaths from terrorism since the 9/11 suicide attacks. 

The report’s authors attribute the majority of incidents over the past few years to groups with a religious agenda. 

Before 2000, it was nationalist separatist terrorist organisations such as the IRA and Chechen rebels who were behind the most attacks. The number of incidents from nationalist separatist groups has remained relatively stable in the years since while religious extremism has grown. 

The prevalence of Islamist groups in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria and Syria is the main driver behind these trends. 

This report is interesting because it flies in the face of  arguments given by Islamic apologists, like Reza Aslan, who argue that religion is NOT the trigger for extremist views or violence.

And in fact making this connection was what got Bill Maher into so much trouble recently.

However I would be quick to mention that just because it seems that Islam is the religion of choice for most terrorists today, there is still plenty of terrorism in the name of Christ as well.

And it could be argued that in the not too distant past Christian terrorism terrorized communities around the world for many hundreds of years before it was brought under some semblance of control by more civilized minds.

As Steven Weinberg once said, "Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."


Sarah Palin and John McCain give President Obama advice on dealing with Iran, because apparently they could not find a subject they were less qualified to weigh in on.


Courtesy of puerile pundit's Facebook page:  

President Palling Around With Terrorists (Boy she never lets these tired overused chestnuts die does she?)

Good God, Mr. President. To partner with Iran is to trust the enemy, which is insane. Iran has complicity in the rise of ISIS as it supports radical militias and arms Islamic terrorists. (Actually Iran has already pledged support for Iraq in fighting against ISIS.)


You've been the luckiest man in the world, in an un-American Democracy sort of way, to have had the liberal media in your lap allowing you to execute the least transparent presidency in history while they mock and destroy your critics for you. (WTF media is she talking about?) Until now. Even they must see that without accountability you are leading us into very, very dangerous territory. 

In the 2008 campaign Sen. McCain and I warned, on behalf of every reasonable person, that your willingness to negotiate with terrorists would get Americans killed; that pulling an anti-Reagan move by taking our Big Stick of strength and putting it in the hands of any foe could be insurmountably devastating for our allies. Iran is one of Israel's staunchest enemies. Mr. President, who is advising you to come against Israel? (Okay now the idea that talking with Iran means you are coming against Israel only works if you are a crazy person. By the way it was through letters back and forth that Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev ended the Cold War. Was Reagan "coming against" America by corresponding with our enemy?)


What is wrong with you, Barack Obama? You can not pal around with terrorists and expect us to survive. 

 - Sarah Palin 

The post then links to a letter from McCain where he goes all "get off my damn lawn" in  a statement suggesting that any outreach to the Iranian government would destroy any chance the moderates in Syria have of defeating the Assad regime.

You remember John "Bomb Bomb Iran" McCain's carefully considered opinion on dealing with Iran don't you? Yeah, in McCain's view of the world the only good outcome in our struggle with Iran  is one in which American troops stand among the piles of dead Iranians.

By the way in this "secret" letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei the President made the following completely unreasonable suggestion: 

The letter appeared aimed both at buttressing the campaign against Islamic State and nudging Iran’s religious leader closer to a nuclear deal. 

Mr. Obama stressed to Mr. Khamenei that any cooperation on Islamic State was largely contingent on Iran reaching a comprehensive agreement with global powers on the future of Tehran’s nuclear program by a Nov. 24 diplomatic deadline, the same people say.

Yes how dare he try to reach a nuclear deal with Iran and attempt to get them to side with other nations in fighting a scourge that threatens their neighbors and fellow Muslims.

What the hell was he thinking?

So much better to remain forever enemies and have each other to use as the boogeyman when ginning up fear during election cycles or to increase military spending.

Fucking idiots!


 

Public News Network Copyright © 2010 LKart Theme is Designed by Lasantha